pighead

ok, let's say discuss any of the specific questions is against cfa code....

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-5 0:33:38编辑过]

pighead

No. 10

when the full amount of the block order is not executed, allocating partially

executed orders among the participating client accounts pro rata on the

basis of order size; (From CFA Book)

executed orders among the participating client accounts pro rata on the

basis of order size; (From CFA Book)

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-7 6:18:42编辑过]

pighead

No. 12

Book says:

Disclose levels of service. Members and candidates should disclose to all clients

whether or not the organization offers different levels of service to clients for the

same fee or different fees. Different levels of service should not be offered to

clients selectively.

My understanding is it didn't say you have to list all the services and fees...but you should publish if you can offer different level of services with different fees...and You should be able to negotiate the fees with your clients.

whether or not the organization offers different levels of service to clients for the

same fee or different fees. Different levels of service should not be offered to

clients selectively.

My understanding is it didn't say you have to list all the services and fees...but you should publish if you can offer different level of services with different fees...and You should be able to negotiate the fees with your clients.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-7 6:20:27编辑过]

pighead

No. 2 - did it say document different opinion on the report?

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-7 6:17:41编辑过]

pighead

No. 6. - may not be the lowest fees but they provide research, something like that, that benefits the client...

The book says:

Seek best execution. Members and candidates must seek best execution for

their clients. Best execution refers to the trading process firms apply that

seeks to maximize the value of a client’s portfolio within the client’s stated

investment objectives and constraints.

pighead

QUOTE:

以下是引用yukichao在2007-6-7 17:12:00的发言：

题干好像是收购价高于净资产的market value，我觉得这个值应该在商誉中体现，而不应该是无形资产或是别的什么专利权之类。

题目说了收购价高于MV的部分都记入一个无形资产,不作为商誉...所以需要加入那个无形资产的摊消的...

一般而言,高于MV的部分应该先考虑有没有什么无形资产,没有的话,才作为商誉...

pighead

QUOTE:

以下是引用koeln在2007-6-7 22:56:00的发言：

第2题我印象是选A，no evidence

DW是1.64，正好在中间那一档，do not reject no evidence

我怎么记得我算了,是在DL 和4-DU之间呢,然后我就得出了一个inclusive的结论...

pighead

QUOTE:

以下是引用koeln在2007-6-8 9:19:00的发言：

………………If du < DW < 4 - du' there is no serial correlation

DL, 4-DU, 4-DL, DU,是这个顺序吗?

在4-DU 和4-DL之间是没有correlation吧....

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-8 21:53:28编辑过]