ACCAspace_sitemap
PPclass_sitemap
sitemap_google
sitemap_baidu
CFA Forums
返回列表 发帖
很明显CFA在推销教材……光看notes做notes mock sample的很吃亏,很多notes提到的重点都和考题南辕北辙了,economics居然全是概念,计算题还比较简单,大多数概念题都拿捏不准,估计高低分拉不开差距,今年海过。

TOP

hustgang做的真仔细,的确,貌似题目比sample或者notes后面的简单,其实很多trick,准确率一定不会高,如果是按照前10%的70%的说法,估计这次及格线也不会高。

TOP

看看老外考生怎么看这次二级考试的吧:

Because you gloss over important, core material like All Current/Temporal (I mean, could those questions have been any easier?) and then you slam people in portfolio mgmt and ask multiple sets on derivatives, all the while covering every single nook and cranny of material.

I know some people are going to have a problem with someone saying things like this, but I just dont see how there's benefit to testing the material in this way. The "important" topics that require so much more attention should be treated as such. You want CFAs to know the core of the material, so test them on it. Personally, I dont think the economics questions asked were anywhere NEAR as valuable as, say, Triangular arbitrage, or risk premiums. thats what you want people to know, to learn and to study, then test them on it.

TOP

大概扫了下,老外反映跟我们差不多,都反映FSA比较tricky,上午比较有把握,下午吃不准,基本都是quants ok, qualitative sucks...

哎,数学不拿满分,惘为炎黄子孙,这下跟老外拼qualitative,要吃亏了

TOP

返回列表